|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| WATER QUALITY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
“Water
quality”
is a value judgment humans make based upon the physical, chemical and biological
properties of water. These properties vary depending upon the intended “beneficial
uses” for the water. You would expect drinking water to be cleaner than water used for boating. Each state
sets water quality standards to protect these beneficial uses.
In 1972, Congress passed the Clean Water Act (CWA) in response to the unhealthy state of the nation’s lakes, streams, rivers, and coastal areas. At the time, only one third of the nation’s waters were safe for swimming and fishing, eliciting a great amount of public concern. The Clean Water Act is a complex law, but it helps support and fund water quality monitoring, limits pollutant discharge, supports restoration, and protects wetlands. One aspect of the CWA is that it helps establish the amount of pollutant a waterbody can receive daily and maintain water quality standards. The process is briefly described below : 1. Water Quality Assessment. Streams are tested for various parameters, such as bacteria, dissolved oxygen, nutrients, sediments, etc. to see if the water meets state-approved water quality standards. Monitoring can be costly and time consuming, so many streams and rivers have yet to be tested and identified as streams of concern. 2. Compile List of Water Quality Limited Streams. Streams not meeting the water quality standards are added to the “water quality limited” list, which is commonly referred to as the “303(d) list” after the section of the CWA that mandates the list. When establishing the 303(d) list, the state agency must consider “all available data.” The majority of streams on the 303(d) list are for temperature, since it is one of the easiest parameters to accurately measure. 3. Establish Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL). Once a stream or river has been identified as “water quality limited,” the CWA states that a TMDL must be established for all streams listed on the 303(d) list. A TMDL is the total amount of pollutant from all sources that can enter a waterbody without violating the water quality standard. The goal for establishing TMDL’s is to have streams and rivers meet water quality standards. The lack of established TMDL’s and the small percentage of waterbodies on the 303(d) list does not reflect on the cleanliness of our waterways, rather it can be explained by the initiative, money and effort required to go through the process. Something important to consider when looking at the 303(d) list of water quality limited waterbodies is how populated the watershed is. Populated areas usually have more roads to access streams, and more concerned citizens living near waterways. One reason for the high number of 303(d) listed streams in Tualatin River Basin (in Washington County, OR) is because of the high population and a high level of monitoring. The Tualatin might not have the same number of water quality limited streams if it were not the most studied watershed in the state.
Some Factors that can Influence Water Quality: Non-Point Source Pollution Since the Clean Water Act of 1972 established regulations for point sources that emit or discharge pollution into the waterways, point source pollution has been greatly reduced. Non-point source pollution is now the primary concern for our waterways. A common culprit of non-point source pollution in residential areas are the fertilizers and chemicals people apply to their lawns in order to keep them green. These chemicals leak into waterways with rain. The combined nutrient and chemical runoff from many homes can have a large effect on stream health.
Loss of Riparian Vegetation |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Click on thumbnail to see a larger image of erosion on the Tualatin River. Sediment loss along this bank is probably due to vegetation loss. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Native Vegetation It is not sufficient to have just any plant species function as a vegetative buffer to reduce erosion, hold onto water, and filter pollutants along a waterway. Invasive plant species such as reed canary grass, Himalayan blackberry, Scotch broom, Japanese knotweed, and garlic mustard are less effective buffers and take over riparian areas creating a monoculture. Instead of riparian ecosystems supporting a diverse plant and tree community that functions as previously described, invasive plant species thrive especially in disturbed areas and prevent other species from taking root. Plants such as reed canary grass are extremely difficult to get rid of once it has established itself due to its thick, mat-like root system. Because reed canary grass can grow up to 10 feet high, it takes over tree and understory habitats, resulting in high water temperatures and little pool habitat, causing low quality habitat for aquatic life. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||